Divinetruth

Menu
Menu

The Antichrist in Christianity: A Theological Analysis

| Posted on |

Introduction: The concept of the “Antichrist” has been a subject of theological debate and controversy throughout Christian history. In many Christian teachings, the Antichrist is considered a figure who opposes the teachings of Jesus Christ, denies His divinity, and ultimately seeks to deceive believers into following false doctrines. While interpretations of the Antichrist vary, one central theme is clear: the Antichrist represents a force or person who goes against the true nature and message of Jesus as the Christ. This paper will explore the meaning of the term “Antichrist,” delve into the biblical understanding of Christ, examine historical theological developments, and argue that the early Christian figure of Paul and the Church’s institutional developments have shifted the true meaning of “Christ” in a way that can be seen as antithetical to Jesus’ original mission.

1. What is the Antichrist?

In Christian theology, the term “Antichrist” refers to any person or force that opposes Christ or seeks to deny His role as the Messiah. The word itself comes from the Greek term antichristos, meaning “against Christ” or “in place of Christ.” The concept is primarily drawn from New Testament scriptures, notably in the Johannine epistles, where the Antichrist is described as one who denies Jesus as the Christ (1 John 2:22, 4:3; 2 John 1:7). The Antichrist, therefore, is not simply a single eschatological figure, but more broadly represents anyone or anything that denies or distorts the true nature of Christ.

2. Those Who Deny Jesus as the Christ

A fundamental belief within Christianity is the acknowledgment that Jesus is the Christ, the anointed one, or the Messiah. To be a Christian means to accept that Jesus fulfills the prophecies of the Old Testament, is the Savior of humanity, and is the Son of God. However, those who deny that Jesus is the Christ are often considered in opposition to the Christian faith, a stance which makes them “antichrists” in the biblical sense.

The concept of denying Jesus as the Christ is especially significant in the context of early Christian debates. The apostle John, for instance, was clear in his epistle that anyone who denies the Christ (Jesus as the Messiah) is an “antichrist” (1 John 2:22). To be an antichrist, then, is not merely to oppose Jesus in a general sense but to directly reject His identity as the Christ and Savior.

3. The Meaning of Christ and the Denial of Its Proper Understanding

Although Christians refer to Jesus as “the Christ,” the true meaning of “Christ” is often misunderstood or inadequately conveyed. The term “Christ” comes from the Greek Christos, which means “the Anointed One,” a translation of the Hebrew Mashiach (Messiah). This term was historically understood to refer to the expected Jewish king and prophet who would bring about the restoration of Israel. In the New Testament, Jesus is identified as the Christ, but there is confusion over what “Christ” actually entails.

The primary confusion arises from the fact that, when the term “Christ” is explored more deeply, it is revealed that Jesus, as the Christ, was understood to be a prophet and king, primarily sent to the Jews, not a divine figure as understood in mainstream Christian doctrine today. It is only with the development of Christian theology, particularly through the writings of Paul, that the term “Christ” evolved to be associated with the concept of a divine, co-equal part of a Triune Godhead.

When the true meaning of “Christ” is explored—namely, that Jesus was a prophet and king of the Jews—many Christians today, influenced by centuries of theological tradition, may reject this understanding and instead affirm a doctrine of the Trinity, which is not fully supported by the original teachings of Jesus. This rejection of the original meaning of Christ is, in a sense, a denial of Jesus’ true mission, leading to a modern form of Antichrist theology.

4. Jesus as a Prophet and King of the Jews: Biblical Evidence

The Bible clearly portrays Jesus as both a prophet and a king, though this understanding has been overshadowed by later Christian developments.

  1. Jesus as Prophet:Jesus is often identified as a prophet in the New Testament. In Luke 7:16, after Jesus raises the widow’s son, the people exclaim, “A great prophet has appeared among us.” Similarly, in Matthew 21:11, when Jesus enters Jerusalem, the crowds ask, “Who is this?” and answer their own question by stating, “This is Jesus, the prophet from Nazareth in Galilee.”

The title of prophet is also given to Jesus in John 4:19, when the Samaritan woman at the well identifies Him as a prophet after He reveals her personal history. Furthermore, Jesus Himself refers to His role as a prophet in passages like Luke 13:33: “In any case, I must press on today and tomorrow and the next day— for surely no prophet can die outside Jerusalem.”

  1. Jesus as King of the Jews:Jesus’ kingship is affirmed by both His followers and His accusers. In Matthew 27:37, during His crucifixion, the inscription placed above Him reads, “This is Jesus, the King of the Jews.” Jesus’ own words further suggest that He saw Himself as a king, though not in a political sense as His followers might have hoped. In John 18:36, when questioned by Pilate about His kingship, Jesus states, “My kingdom is not of this world.”

The prophetic and royal aspects of Jesus’ identity are vital for understanding His mission, as they align with Old Testament prophecies of a coming Messiah who would restore Israel, both spiritually and politically.

5. Paul and the Early Church: The Shift in Christian Doctrine

The shift in the understanding of Jesus as the Christ is most notably associated with the apostle Paul. Paul, in his letters, developed a theology of Christ that was distinct from the teachings of Jesus during His earthly ministry. One of the most significant departures in Pauline theology was the concept of the divinity of Christ, which became central to later Christian thought but was not a focal point of Jesus’ own message. In contrast, Jesus emphasized His role as a prophet and king sent to the Jews (Matthew 15:24). Paul, however, promoted a message that transcended Jewish particularism and redefined Jesus as a cosmic savior for all humanity, which paved the way for the creation of Christianity as a separate religion from Judaism.

Paul and the Antichrist: In his writings, Paul can be seen as a figure who altered the nature of Jesus’ mission, presenting Jesus as the Christ in a way that may be seen as contradictory to the way Jesus Himself defined His role. According to the article “Paul: His Mission, Truth or Falsehood?” Paul’s teachings introduced elements such as the idea of salvation through grace alone and a universal savior, which stand in contrast to Jesus’ focus on repentance, faith, and the Kingdom of God (Matthew 4:17).

The Church’s Role in the Antichrist Narrative: The institutional Church, particularly through the doctrine of the Trinity, further distanced Jesus from His original identity as a prophet and king of the Jews. By elevating Jesus to the status of a co-equal member of the divine Trinity, the Church contradicted Jesus’ own teachings and the biblical portrayal of His role.

6. Jesus’ Mission Was to the Jews: The Construction of Christianity

Jesus’ mission was primarily to the Jewish people, as stated in Matthew 15:24, where Jesus says, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.” His teachings, miracles, and prophecies were all rooted in the Jewish tradition. However, over time, Paul and the early Church shifted the focus from Jesus’ mission to the Jews to a broader, more inclusive message that sought to establish a new religious identity: Christianity.

As discussed in the article “Did Jesus Identify as a Christian and Bring a New Religion?”, Christianity as we know it today is a construct of Paul and the early Church, not of Jesus. Jesus did not preach a new religion; He sought to reform Judaism and proclaim the Kingdom of God to Israel. It was only through the influence of Paul and later Church councils that the teachings of Jesus were reframed within the context of a new religious movement that became Christianity.

7. Christians Today Oppose the Teachings of Jesus in Favor of Pauline Doctrine

Another significant way in which modern Christianity diverges from the teachings of Jesus is in how many Christians follow the views taught by the apostle Paul and the institutional Church, often opposing the teachings of Christ. Here are some examples:

  1. Jesus’ Identification as a Prophet: Jesus repeatedly referred to Himself as a prophet (Matthew 21:11, Luke 13:33). He never claimed to be the Son of God or a divine being. Yet, Christians today often reject this and teach that Jesus is the Son of God, part of the Triune Godhead—something that is not supported by Jesus’ own words. In fact, Jesus’ rejection of divine status can be seen in John 14:28, when He says, “The Father is greater than I.”
  2. The Sabbath: Jesus upheld the Sabbath and clarified its true meaning (Mark 2:27). But Christians, particularly through the influence of the Church, abandoned Saturday as the Sabbath and instead observe Sunday as the day of worship and rest. This shift is a clear departure from the instructions of Jesus, who followed the traditional Jewish practice of observing the Sabbath.
  3. Jesus’ Mission to the Jews: In Matthew 15:24, Jesus stated that He was sent only to the “lost sheep of Israel.” However, Paul and the Church have expanded Jesus’ mission to include all of humanity, establishing Christianity as a universal religion. This shift drastically alters the nature of Jesus’ mission, which was deeply rooted in Jewish tradition.
  4. Repentance vs. Atonement: Jesus’ message was clear—repent for the Kingdom of God is near (Matthew 4:17). Yet, Christianity often teaches that salvation comes not through repentance but through belief in Jesus’ atoning death. This departure from Jesus’ original message diminishes the importance of repentance, a core element of His teachings.
  5. Prayer to God vs. Prayer to Jesus: Jesus consistently prayed to God (Matthew 26:39) and taught His disciples to pray to God (Luke 11:2). However, many Christians pray directly to Jesus, in a manner that Jesus Himself did not teach. This shift further underscores the alteration of the relationship between the believer and God, as originally defined by Jesus.

These examples highlight how modern Christian doctrines often contradict the clear teachings of Jesus, revealing a significant theological shift that has, in many ways, replaced His message with doctrines that align more closely with the views of Paul and the institutional Church. Thus the modern church and Christians today can be considered Antichrist in that they go against Jesus’ teaching.

8. Being a True Christian

The true meaning of being Christian, when understood within the context of Jesus’ mission to the Jews, would imply that the Jews themselves are the intended followers (i.e., Christians), as Jesus was sent specifically to them. This is consistent with His own words in Matthew 15:24, where He states, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.”

However, for modern-day Christians who seek to be true followers of Jesus, it is essential to reconsider the doctrines that have been introduced by the Church and Paul over the centuries. To authentically follow Jesus, one must look primarily to the Gospels, the Law, and the writings of the Prophets, rather than to the later additions to the Bible that reflect the influence of the early Church. Many of these additional texts were written long after the time of the original apostles and have been altered through generations of copying and interpretation, often to serve the theological interests of the Church.

This is particularly evident in problematic passages, such as the so-called Great Commission, which claims that Jesus instructed His disciples to go and preach to all nations. This direct command contradicts Jesus’ own mission to Israel, as outlined in the Gospels, and appears to reflect later Church developments rather than the original message.

Furthermore, the doctrine of the Trinity, which has become a cornerstone of mainstream Christianity, was not taught by Jesus, and its influence can sometimes be found subtly inserted into certain biblical texts. By focusing solely on the authentic Gospels, the Hebrew Scriptures, and avoiding later interpolations, you can better align with the original teachings of Jesus and be a true follower of Christ, as He intended.

In this way, if you seek to walk the true path of Christianity, it is vital to strip away the corruptions introduced by the early Church and adhere strictly to the words and mission of Jesus, as recorded in the Gospels and the earlier scriptures.

Conclusion

The teachings of Jesus, when carefully examined, reveal a clear focus on repentance, worship of the one true God, and the restoration of Israel through His prophetic and royal role. However, over the centuries, the influence of Paul and the institutional Church has altered this understanding, shifting the focus from Jesus as a prophet and king sent specifically to the Jewish people to a more universalized and often contradictory version of Christianity. In this sense, modern Christian teachings—particularly those that deny Jesus’ role as a prophet and the emphasis on repentance—can be seen as veering away from the true message of Christ. This theological departure is not only a distortion of His words but, in a broader sense, can be seen as an embodiment of the “Antichrist”—a force that opposes or distorts the true nature. Are you then following Jesus or satan?

References:

  • 1 John 2:22
  • Luke 7:16
  • Matthew 21:11
  • John 4:19
  • Matthew 27:37
  • John 18:36
  • Matthew 15:24
  • “Paul: His Mission, Truth or Falsehood?” – Divinetruth
  • “Did Jesus Identify as a Christian and Bring a New Religion?” – Divinetruth
Scroll to Top